Comparison of Rhino-Rack Aero-Style Roof Racks
Updated 07/04/2017 | Published 07/02/2017
Products Featured in This Question
Question:
Other than appearance, are there any particular advantages/disadvantages between the RS2500 Aero and the 2500 bars?
asked by: James H
Expert Reply:
The Rhino-Rack 2500 Aero-style roof rack that consists of Crossbars # RRVA118B-2, Legs # RRRLKVA, and Fit Kit # DK195 is a traditional design.
The RS 2500 with Vortex Aero Crossbars # RRRS490 uses the aero bars which are much more aerodynamic than the square bars which reduces wind noise. In addition to the shape, the rubberized Vortex strips in the channels work to reduce drag and therefore cut down on noise. This system also sits flush with the legs so it has a more factory look to it than the square bars do.
Another difference to keep in mind is that some accessories do not fit certain bar shapes. So if you have a carrier of some sort that fits square bars and not aero bars, you want to choose the square bar rack.
Product Page this Question was Asked From
Rhino-Rack Vortex Aero Crossbars - Aluminum - Black - 46" Long - Qty 2
- Roof Rack
- Crossbars
- Aero Bars
- 46 Inch Bar Space
- 2 Bars
- Overhang
- Black
- Rhino Rack
more information >
Featured Help Information
Miscellaneous Media
Continue Researching
- Q&A: How Does Rhino-Rack Roof Rack Anchor to 2022 Mazda CX-5 with Bare Roof
- Q&A: How to Remove Locked Rhino-Rack Roof Rack without Key
- Q&A: Can The Rhino Rack Reconn-Deck Crossbars Be Mounted To RLT600 Legs?
- Q&A: Can Roof Rack Tracks be Installed on A.R.E. Truck Cap
- Q&A: Will Thule Motion XT Fit on Rhino Rack of 2014 Lexus CT200h
- Q&A: Recommended Bolts for Mounting Solar Panels on Rhino-Rack Heavy-Duty Crossbars
- Q&A: Recommended Roof Rack for a 2023 Mazda CX-5 w/ a Naked Roof